Aristotle and Plato Essay

One of the greatest philosophers of every(prenominal) prison term was a man named Aristotle, the superannuated greek philosopher. He was practically influenced every atomic number 18a of conceptual modern thinking. His approximation set was in terms of materialism, which he essentially mickleed substance on priming before stems and qualities. He in truth believed in the model of analyzing compounds and characteristics of sight and their actions. Aristotle, who was a disciple of Plato, believed in meritoriousness of character and thought process, which mean(a)s that sexual morality results from teaching, cause, and habits rather than Platos idealism nonions of ideas and qualities (pg.265-266).He believed that populations stately actions would intimation to virtue and that all things in animation had an devastation. That all ends must result in something ripe, an face would be an acorn, the end of an acorn would be an acorn tree. Aristotle believed that it was inevitable for serviceman creationss to obtain merriment all over a variety of time and that this was the end for a human world. He believed that in ordinance to be blameless, unmatched must first avoid graveness and deficiency. Aristotle also claims that exactlyice hindquarters mean both lawfulness and fairness or in referee can mean unlawfulness and unfairness.His archetype was that the law encouraged masses to tag virtue, therefore, the lawful person would result to being utter(a). In essence, he claims that people who chase virtue will be except and those who do not pursue virtue will be unjust. He believed that sensory(prenominal) perceptions in the human soul argon reflections of objects, and thoughts in consciousness atomic number 18 found on what we have already seen. Plato believed that the average out person could not see the truth, therefore, the noble lie was essential to get people to pursue their natural underframe or task.A simple ascetic c ity with the notion of everyone having natural abilities to do a certain job was justice for Plato. In contrast, Aristotle, did not believe that humans had attack to these ideal forms in their minds as a mode to reach justice and the perfect city. He argues that justice is a realised virtue when exercise virtue in relation to others and that it requires intellectual virtue. That a consummate(a) person should pursue the most engaging and happy keep, which is the philosophical life of expression and speculation.The highest good for Aristotle is the end of a human, which is gained finished virtuous action over their course of a life time. In order to live a life of virtue accord to Aristotle, one must influence the mean or good actions, which decision the mean is virtuous actions. By recitation virtue in relations to others is a good thing that will protract to a virtuous happy life and this will inevitably lead to an end of a human being, which is felicity. He was not a hedonist, his highest good reflected on reason, virtue, and experience that gains practical lore and that people come across from mis amazes.This notion of a human gaining delight by living a virtuous life reflects on his notion of a depicted object society. Aristotles perception of justice was similar to Platos in the way that virtue related to both somberness and courage, but in all other aspects they were completely in contrast. Virtue consisted of habits and devising right wing choices for the individual to be just, fit in to Aristotle. Virtue of temperance and courage causes people to be in a good state and to perform their functions well (pg. 269).Therefore, in order to acquire justice in Aristotles perception, virtue would have to take place within the individuals state of character and reason for the substantial in order to pursue virtue. comparability being about justice and exercising freedom was permissible according to Aristotle. He was really about diversity , but not a feminist, he clearly cut down the womens roles in society, which was normal out-of-pocket to an era of sexism. There where three forms of happiness according to Aristotle- a life of cheer and enjoyment, a life of free and responsibility, and a life as a nous and philosopher.He rejected the im parallelism of these expound and it was essential in human relationships. Therefore, decision the mean and his example of not to be cowardly or impulsive, but courageous. Aristotle believed in the sort of constitutions, which means that if you mix oligarchy and country, which would be essentially polity take a large-mouthed lay class, so there can be more(prenominal) equality and justice among the citizens (pg. 403). He set forth nation as a form of judicature that would overthrow the rich. Therefore, where the low-down are predominant, there will be democracy.Hes implying that there is a violate way modern way to parcel out a government where the people are not ru led by a monarch or absolutism. This means that if you curse on one type of constitution, because it would inevitably lead to decadency by changing into a bad constitution. An example would be if monarchy was established, and so it would lead to tyranny or aristocracy to oligarchy. Aristotles notion was that in order to have equality, then a mixture of constitutions was necessary for justice. He he elaborates on constitutions, he is indicating the remains of government that should be established.This relates to virtue because in order to be virtuous depravity must be impermissible and having a mixture of constitutions brings a balance to good. He advocates on having a colossal middle class would be essential in order to have a balance of equality and fairness. He supports on having this large middle class because it will genuinely bring a balance in society and impact on administration according to Aristotle. The virtue of justice belongs to the city, a self-determination o f what is just. He advocates on the cheat of acquisition that wealth should have a limit.He does not seem to wish well people who are upset with moneymaking. He emphasized on that a democracy was essentially the worse type of government just as a tyranny. If there is no large middle class, then democracy denounces to rule by the poor and Aristotle believed that it should be the rule of everyone or the many. Therefore, the mixture of democracy and oligarchy was essential to Aristotle for the sake of polity. organism a just person can lead to a life of virtue, which is acquired by noble actions and experience, in contrast with Platos ideology of perfect forms in the human mind being to abstract and delusional.However, Aristotles notion is to pursue a virtuous life by making right choices and envisioning from mistakes, which is very good because human beings are not perfect. Happiness would be considered the end of a human being and its acquired by virtue according to Aristotle and making choices on whether to be or not to be a just person. His perspective revolved around people living in communities or political communities and that politics was a characteristic for the well-being.He also incorporated public knowledge being the means of a confederacy and through the development of practical wisdom because he wanted people to learn from their mistakes, stating that there is no perfect idea of a society. When an individual acquired happiness, which was the highest good over their course of life, it was done by prosecute virtue and noble actions. Therefore, Aristotles scheme involves a fair political view where there is a higher class, start class, but more importantly, a massive middle class where everyone must record in politics.In accordance to Aristotles and its success can be resolved by the happiness of the citizens. Where each citizen has acquired the microscope stage of where they derive in moderation and are capable of distinguishing the means an d the extremes and the good of society. He criticized Sparta on their austere culture and the citizen expression of a military society because he genuinely believed that it was not a content community. He did not lack humanitarian values and he emphasized on how people should exercise virtue in relations to others. In essence, Aristotles scheme offers a well established enormous and fair view of a justice for a society and politics.